13

Are subsets of vegan diets on-topic? For example, do we welcome questions on fruitarianism and Raw veganism?

  • 5
    One of the problems with those diets is the high level of nonsense that the communities propagate. We'd need to be careful to separate out the truth from the nonsense. – Martin Tournoij Jan 31 '17 at 19:45
  • 5
    @Carpetsmoker I think this community has been handling nonsense very well so far. Maybe we can offer them a place safe from the nonsense. – Ramon Melo Feb 1 '17 at 16:04
14

Yes - I think that creating tags for such subsets (e.g. frutarianism or raw) would be useful, too.

  • ... because they do not have their own site, and creating their own stack-exchange might prove impossible, seeing as this, in reality much larger community (vegans and vegetarians) already has a slow start here. – hoijui Jan 31 '17 at 21:26
  • 3
    @hoijui You said that hours after we started, that's a bit early to measure the viability of a site… – gerrit Feb 1 '17 at 16:50
  • 1
    ouh sorry, i meant to say that this much larger community, thriving and active as it is, still took up to now to get their own stack-exchange site, simply because the process is designed this way. The fruitarians, would probably take much longer, if they'd manage at all. – hoijui Feb 2 '17 at 8:46
  • 1
    @gerrit, there was an attempt to launch a vegetarianism site before, and it failed. Also, it took a long time from definition to commitment to beta. – Turion Feb 2 '17 at 9:51
  • @Turion I didn't know that. Did it reach β? Do you have a link to its Area51 page? – gerrit Feb 2 '17 at 11:12
  • @gerrit, I can't find it anymore, so I must suspect it was deleted. I don't think it made it to beta. – Turion Feb 2 '17 at 11:24

You must log in to answer this question.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged .